From the talk

The Team Pulse: AI-Native Edition

Leadership Resource: Measuring Team Health in the Age of Generative AI

Instructions: Run this survey anonymously. Rate each statement from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree).

I. Psychological Safety

Safety to Fail: "I feel comfortable sharing a situation where an AI tool I used gave me a wrong or 'unwise' suggestion."
Role Clarity: "I clearly understand which parts of my job should be augmented by AI and which require my unique human judgment."
Experimental Freedom: "I feel encouraged to experiment with new AI-native workflows, even if they temporarily slow down my output."

Critical Auditing: "When I use AI-generated code or text, I spend more time questioning the reasoning behind the output than I do fixing the syntax."
Wisdom Transfer: "Our senior engineers spend time teaching us how to spot AI hallucinations and architectural flaws, rather than just doing the work for us."
The "80/20" Balance: "AI handles the 'boilerplate' of my day (the first 80%), allowing me to focus on high-stakes architecture and decision-making (the final 20%)."

Knowledge Accessibility: "Our team's internal documentation is structured well enough that an AI agent could actually help me solve a complex, domain-specific problem."

Average Score	Team Persona	Leadership Strategy
4.2 – 5.0	AI-Native	Orchestrate: Empower them to build autonomous agents; protect their white space for innovation.
3.0 – 4.1	AI-Augmented	Mentor: Focus on "Judgment Skills" training. Fix the "Reviewer Overload" for seniors.
Under 3.0	AI-Struggling	Protect: Address AI anxiety and data quality first. Maintain the "Technical Soul."

Use it, adapt it, hand it on. A mention is nice, not required.